21 Aug 2007

New Website for Incinerator information

There is a new website with lots of information regarding "Incineration" or that term our politicians so love to use, "Energy From Waste".


The website is called DURHAM ENVIRONMENT WATCH or D.E.W. Looks interesting with credible information. It appears that Durham residents are getting fed up with the treatment they receive as well as the lack of understanding or care for the environment from Durham Region politicians (remember the recent greenbelt fiasco?). Once again that same bunch seem to be a 'retrograde council' or 'bastard child of the 905' (Toronto newspaper terms describing Durham Region) where it concerns environmental issues.



We hope those politicians will take a little bit of time to read some of the material on the site instead of following the infomercials put out by the regional consultants and European incinerator owner/operators.



Something I found very interesting, especially since those holier than thou politicians who took the Magical Mystery Tour to Europe are so fond of telling us all how wonderful the European countries are in their waste diversion efforts - getting all the way to 88 or 90% diversion. They fail, however to say that this rate is AFTER they burn most of their municipal waste. They have an even more pitiful diversion rate than Clarington (42% according to Durham Region). Europe-wide their rate is only 33% (before incineration). Does incineration cause lower diversion rates? We've been saying all along that it does. It's the wrong direction to take, and now the European Union seems to agree!


INCINERATION UNDER SCRUTINY IN EUROPE - In February 2007, the European Union redrafted its waste protocol to make diversion a priority. A crucial point for the Members of Parliament was to reduce the amount of landfill and incineration, both of which cause pollution. Members rejected the idea that incineration be regarded as recovery. This should have major ramifications for the incineration industry as Europe-wide, only 33% of waste is diverted by recycling or composting.


Do we really want to go where Europe has been? Why not take a cue from them as they have learned something from having all those incinerators. Those incinerators are polluting just as landfill does, and they must reduce BOTH landfill AND incineration.



Read the articles. You may become enlightened.

2 Aug 2007

Integrity is not a conditional word

July 30, Bowmanville, ON

Protest against Council's refusal to LISTEN.
"Say NO to INCINERATION"



Much has happened recently regarding the Durham Region "Incineration Issue". A peer review report from Clarington Staff and presentations by peer reviewers were scheduled to be heard on Monday, July 30, 2007 at Clarington Town Hall. A special GPA and Council meeting had been scheduled for that day, with the peer review report being promised to residents on the Thursday prior to that date. Of course that never happened. The presentations and report were pulled from the agenda, despite claims by the Mayor that they were never on the agenda.

Residents of Durham Region put together a protest on short notice, showing they do not accept the treatment they have been receiving from Clarington OR from the Durham politicians. And the discontent seems to be growing and spreading far beyond just Clarington's borders.

At the meeting in Council chambers, more excuses as to why the report was pulled by the CAO - he didn't receive it by Tuesday at 4:30 pm so could not sign it on Wednesday. He did receive it on Wednesday morning, and of course could not have taken one more day to read and sign it and still allow it to be available to the public by Thursday, or Friday, or even Monday. Or even this week.

The deadline for the commenting period for the Municipality and the public was to be on July 31. This peer review report was important information for residents (and municipality) to assist in knowledge when commenting on Generic Human Health and Environmental Risk Assessment Report by the Region's hired guns... er... consultants. At the meeting on July 30 delegations were told very publicly that the commenting period for both the municipality and the public had been extended. Apparently another bit of untruth or misinformation as a letter to some of the delegations and interested parties on Thursday, August 2, stated that, "The commenting period deadline of July 31,2007 has not been extended for the Municipality of Clarington or the Public." Just one more slap in the face to residents of Clarington and of Durham Region. Conflicting information continues to come from the Region, from Clarington, from the EA Project Manager. Do any of them have any idea what is going on? - And yet another version by Cliff Curtis from the Region saying that the EA Project Manager was wrong and the commenting period has been prolonged. They just can't seem to get their stories straight... And what good does the commenting period being prolonged do if we can't even read the report that we've paid for and are entitled to?

Everyone already believes that the decision has been made (was made long ago, just like the decision to go with EFW and ignore all other -better- alternatives), and that the preferred site has already been chosen and that mass burn incineration is the technology planned to be used. There is no trust in our region or municipality as far as honesty or integrity at this point. Their claims that incineration is risk-free, that it is a good thing, the best thing, that it will not impact our recycling program, that it will make all that garbage (resources) disappear without consequence and will give us extra electricity ALL RING HOLLOW.

The peer review and due diligence reports are being paid for by us - the residents of Durham Region. At least the first $250,000 worth. The next $250,000 worth will be covered either by Durham Region (us again) or by Clarington alone (still us). But what is the point of paying all this money for these independent due diligence and peer review studies that were supposed to be completely independent of Durham Region, and for Clarington's benefit - if Durham gets to adjust or re-work or influence in any way what is contained in those reports? What is the point of paying for these studies if we (the public) are not even allowed to see them until they've been vetted by the Region?

The entire process has now been tainted. Integrity is not a conditional word. It doesn't blow in the wind or change with the weather. Except in Durham and Clarington. One of the truest tests of integrity is its blunt refusal to be compromised. Except in Durham Region and Clarington.

To Regional and Clarington Councils - Have the courage to say no. Have the courage to face the truth. Do the right thing because it is right. These are the magic keys to living your life with integrity. Allow the residents of Clarington access to the reports they have asked for, fought for and paid for.

Show some integrity.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Durham Waste Coalition:
For information on incineration send a blank email to: DurhamWasteFAQ@Hotmail.com

To register to receive updates and information send a blank email to: DurhamWasteReg@Hotmail.com , and pass this information to friends and family.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~